SFC Intensifies Enforcement: A Critical Analysis of Recent Breaches of SFO, Code of Conduct & FMCC

Alfred leung best lawyer in Hong Kong

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has recently concluded a series of decisive enforcement actions, issuing lifetime bans and multi-million-dollar fines. These cases provide a critical legal roadmap of the regulatory perils facing licensed corporations and underscore the indispensable need for expert legal and compliance guidance.

A detailed analysis of the SFC’s disciplinary actions reveal a pattern of breaches across key regulatory pillars: the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) (SFO), the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC (Code of Conduct), and the Fund Manager Code of Conduct (FMCC).

Case Study: Egregious Fraud & Direct Breaches of the SFO

In the most severe cases, the SFC permanently revoked licences and issued lifetime bans for actions that constituted direct offences under the SFO:

  • Misappropriation of Client Assets: The SFC found that firms misused client funds for proprietary trading, a clear breach of General Principle (GP) 8 and paragraph 11.1(a) of the Code of Conduct, which mandate the proper safeguarding and accounting of client assets.

  • Provision of False Information: Corporations and their directors knowingly provided fabricated documents and false narratives to the SFC. This constitutes an offence under sections 180(15) and 184(2) of the SFO, which criminalise the production of false or misleading information in response to the regulator’s statutory demands.

  • Failure to Act with Integrity: The core finding was a breach of GP 1 of the Code of Conduct, which requires licensed persons to act with honesty, fairness, and in the best interests of clients and market integrity. The SFC held senior management directly accountable under GP 9, which imposes primary responsibility on them for maintaining standards of conduct.

Case Study: Systemic Negligence & Operational Compliance Failures

In a separate action, a major bank was fined HK$23.8 million for a series of operational failures, highlighting breaches even where intent was not proven:

  • Overcharging Fees: Failures in applying agreed discount rates led to overcharging, breaching GP 2 (Diligence) and paragraph 2.1 (Accurate Representations) of the Code of Conduct.

  • Inadequate Systems and Controls: Incorrect product risk ratings and valuation errors stemmed from deficient internal procedures, contravening paragraph 12.1 of the Code of Conduct, which requires measures to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements.

  • Non-Disclosure of Conflicts: The failure to disclose investment banking relationships in research reports violated the specific disclosure requirements of paragraph 16.5(d) of the Code of Conduct, as well as the overarching principles of GP 7 (Compliance).

For fund managers, the actions also revealed breaches of the FMCC, specifically paragraph 7.1, which requires that all information supplied to investors be accurate and not misleading.

For further details on these recent SFC enforcement actions, you can refer to the official statements at the following links:

Takeaways for Licensed Corporations & Senior Management

These cases crystallise several non-negotiable legal obligations:

  1. Client Assets are Sacred: Any misuse, however temporary, is a direct breach of Code of Conduct GP 8 and will be treated with the utmost severity by the SFC.

  2. Honesty with the SFC is Paramount: Sections 180 and 183 of the SFO grant the SFC extensive investigative powers. Obstruction or deception during this process, per ss180(15) & 184(2), will severely aggravate any proceeding.

  3. Systems Must be Legally Robust: Operational errors caused by inadequate systems are not excuses; they are themselves breaches of Code of Conduct paragraphs 12.1 and 2.1.

  4. Senior Management Liability is Real: GP 9 of the Code of Conduct is regularly invoked to hold directors and senior managers personally accountable for a firm’s misconduct, extending to lifetime prohibitions.

How YTL LLP Can Help

Navigating this complex regulatory landscape requires proactive legal counsel. Our team provides expert advice on:

  • Compliance Health Checks & Gap Analyses: We conduct reviews of your internal policies against the Code of Conduct, FMCC, and SFC guidelines to identify and remediate legal risks.

  • SFC Investigation Defence: We provide representation in SFC inquiries, leveraging our deep understanding of SFO to protect your interests.

  • Senior Management Training: We educate directors and managers on their personal regulatory obligations and liability under GP 9.

The SFC’s enforcement actions demonstrate a zero-tolerance approach towards deliberate misconduct and systemic negligence.  The legal consequences are significant to risk inadequate advice.  Contact us to ensure your operations are compliant with the SFO, Code of Conduct, and FMCC.  

best lawyer hong kong solicitor alfred leung

Alfred Leung, Partner

alfredleung@hkytl.com; +852 3468 7202

This article is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication.  It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this article. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such informatiowhen